1. Home
  2. Electric Vehicles
  3. Compare Electric Cars
  4. Rimac Nevera vs Lotus Evija

Rimac Nevera vs Lotus Evija

The Rimac Nevera and Lotus Evija sit at the top of the EV market. Both are limited-production electric hypercars built for extreme performance, not daily use. Buyers include collectors, track-focused drivers, and high-net-worth enthusiasts who want cutting-edge EV engineering with exclusivity.

Range differs in real use. The Nevera delivers around 300 miles WLTP, making it more usable beyond short bursts. The Evija targets about 215 miles WLTP, with a focus on peak performance over distance. Charging also splits them apart. The Nevera supports fast DC charging up to 500 kW, among the fastest in any EV. The Evija targets 350 kW charging, still high but behind the Nevera in peak capability.

Rimac Nevera vs Lotus Evija

Pricing sits deep in hypercar territory. The Nevera costs around $2.2 million, while the Evija pushes closer to $2.3 million depending on spec. Availability remains limited for both, with strict production caps and most units already allocated. This comparison helps you decide between better usability and charging advantage in the Nevera versus extreme design focus and brand heritage in the Evija.

Within Rimac, the Nevera stands as the brand’s flagship, alongside projects like the Rimac Concept One. It competes with other high-performance EVs such as the Pininfarina Battista and Tesla Roadster. On the Lotus Cars side, the Evija leads an EV shift that includes the Lotus Emeya and Lotus Eletre, while also rivaling the Battista and Nevera directly in the hypercar space.

The Nevera offers unmatched acceleration, higher real-world range, and leading charging speed, but it carries high weight and limited emotional design appeal for some buyers. The Evija delivers extreme lightweight engineering, standout design, and strong brand identity, but it falls short in range and charging peak while remaining hard to access due to ultra-low production.

Quick verdict: Choose the Nevera for performance metrics and usability edge. Choose the Evija for design purity and brand-driven exclusivity.

Related EV Comparisons

 
  Rimac Nevera
Price $2,000,000.00
Our Rating 6.2 0
Brand RIMAC
Category Electric Cars

MODEL

Available Trims / Variants Rimac Nevera 120kWh

PRICE & AVAILABILITY

Base Price (USD) € 2,000,000
Availability Status Available to order. Released 2021, December

BATTERY & CHARGING

Battery Capacity 120 kWh total
Range (WLTP/CLTC/EPA) 340 mi WLTP, 402 mi NEDC
DC Charging (Max kW) CCS 500 kW max, 0-80% in 22 min
AC Charging (Max kW) Type 2 22 kW

PERFORMANCE

Power Output (kW / hp) AWD 1914 hp (1427 kW)
0–100 km/h / 0-60 mph (seconds) The acceleration numbers are an easy way to compare car performance. We list either time from 0 to 100 km/h or time from 0 to 60mph, depending on which number(s) the manufacturers provide. The lower the acceleration time, the higher performance the car is. 1.7 sec 0-60 mph (1.8 sec 0-62 mph)
Torque (Nm) 2360 Nm (1741 lb-ft)
Top Speed (km/h / mph) 256 mph (412 km/h)

BODY & DIMENSIONS

Dimensions (L×W×H mm) 4750 x 1986 x 1208 mm (187.0 x 78.2 x 47.6 in)
Trunk/Boot Capacity (L) EU: 100 l
Body Style 2 door coupe, 2 seats
Kerb Weight (kg) EU: 2150 kg unladen
Frunk/Bonnet Capacity (L) No

SAFETY & DRIVER ASSISTANCE

Autonomous Driving Level Autopilot with full Self-Driving capability

COMFORT & SEATING

Seating Capacity Heated front seats

DISPLAYS & CONNECTIVITY

Centre Screen (inches) Yes
Driver's Display (inches) Yes
Head-Up Display (HUD) No

TECHNOLOGY

ADDITIONAL SPECS

Note

Additional Notes Carbon-fiber monocoque body (70000 Nm/degree torsional stiffness)
  Rimac Nevera

Disclaimer Note

Specifications sourced from manufacturer data and may reflect WLTP, CLTC, or EPA test conditions. Import prices in your local are estimates based on grey-market landing costs and exclude duties, clearing fees, and local taxes. Figures are subject to change without notice. Always verify with your local importer before purchase. We can not guarantee that the information on this page is 100% correct